Forage and Grain Yield Response to Applied Sulfur in Winter Wheat as Influenced by Source and Rate

Recently, environmental quality issues related to sulfur (S) have made it necessary to reduce its release into the atmosphere in wet or dry forms, which in turn might influence the S requirement of crops. It is anticipated that by 2020, S deposition will decrease by up to 30% in eastern portions of Oklahoma and by 15% throughout the remainder of the state. This change calls for frequent monitoring and evaluation of S nutrition in wheat and other crops. Experiments were conducted at Hennessey and Perkins research stations for a period of seven years starting in the fall of 1996, with the objective of assessing the effect of different levels of elemental and sulfate-S fertilizers on the grain and forage yields of winter wheat in Oklahoma. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with three replications. Four S rates, 0, 56, 112, and 224 kg S ha−1, were applied to the plots from 1996 to 2002 as CaSO4. Another two rates, 56 and 112 kg S ha−1, were included in the trials beginning in 1998 using 92% elemental S. Gypsum, as a source of S for winter wheat, resulted in a greater yield than did elemental S in cases where S fertilizer sources were deemed significant. In six of 14 trials from 1996 to 2002, applied S as CaSO4 significantly increased wheatgrain yields. Observing significant grain and forage yield increases due to applied S was important, but the response was sporadic and unpredictable from one year to the next.